AI screening · AI recruiter
AI recruiter that interviews every applicant and ranks your shortlist
The short answer
An AI recruiter is software that handles the repetitive part of recruiting: it interviews every applicant, asks role-tailored questions, follows up, and scores the answers against a rubric. InterviewAgent.ai runs the first-round screen and returns a ranked shortlist with transcripts. It does not source, negotiate or hire. A human recruiter still makes every decision.
Last updated July 2026
An AI recruiter should do the part of hiring that does not scale: talking to every single applicant. When a role gets hundreds of resumes, most never get a real conversation, and good candidates slip through because there was no time to screen them all.
InterviewAgent.ai is an AI recruiter that interviews every applicant in a structured first-round screen, asks role-tailored questions, follows up on answers, and scores each one against a consistent rubric. It hands your recruiters a ranked shortlist with full transcripts and highlights, so a human makes the final call. Every interview runs with candidate consent and clear AI disclosure, and the agent advances candidates to recruiter review rather than hiring or rejecting on its own.
Interview · score · rank · recruiter reviews · from $149/mo
First-round interview
Candidate consented · AI-conducted00:00 · AI Interviewer
Run the sample interview to watch the AI ask, follow up and score against your rubric.
Scored report
RubricThe report assembles after the interview: overall score, rubric, highlights and a recommendation. You make the final call.
Highlights
Recommendation only · a recruiter makes the final decision
Ranked shortlist
Live, interactive · consent-first · no signup needed
Structured & consistent · bias-audited (EEOC / NYC Local Law 144) · you make the final call
Human-in-the-loop you decide
EEOC and LL144 bias-audited
Why it works
What your team gets with AI recruiter
Interviews everyone
Every applicant gets a real first-round screen instead of a resume skim, so strong candidates are not lost to a backlog no one had time to work through.
Scores on one rubric
Each answer is graded against the same role rubric, giving you consistent, comparable scores instead of gut calls that vary by reviewer and mood.
Ranked shortlist
Your recruiters open a ranked list with transcripts and highlights, so the final decision is theirs but the legwork is already done.
What it handles
Interviewed, scored and shortlisted on autopilot
The agent invites each applicant, runs a role-tailored screening interview by voice or video, asks smart follow-ups, scores every answer against your rubric, and advances the strongest candidates into a ranked shortlist for your recruiters to review.
- Conducts structured first-round screening interviews by voice or video
- Asks role-tailored questions and follows up on each answer
- Scores every candidate against a consistent rubric
- Delivers a ranked shortlist with transcripts and highlights
- Runs with candidate consent, AI disclosure, and a human final decision
Why InterviewAgent.ai
One agent that runs the whole first round
Not a one-way video tool, not a six-figure assessment suite, and not a staffing agency. Interview, score, rank and hand off in one place, shaped to the roles and rubric you already hire on.
Interviews every applicant
A role-tailored screening interview runs by voice or video, with smart follow-ups, on the candidate's schedule. Applicants consent and are told they are speaking with AI, so no qualified person waits days for a first call.
Scores to your rubric
Every answer is scored against the same structured rubric, with transcripts and highlights, so candidates are compared consistently and the scoring stays bias-audited against EEOC guidance and NYC Local Law 144.
Ranks the shortlist
The strongest candidates are advanced into a ranked shortlist your recruiters review. The agent never auto-hires or rejects, it only surfaces who to talk to next, and your team makes every decision.
At a glance
What an AI recruiter does, and what it does not
| Recruiting task | Handled by the agent? | What actually happens |
|---|---|---|
| Sourcing candidates | No | You bring applicants from your job posts, ATS or agency as you do today |
| First-round screening interview | Yes | Every applicant is interviewed by voice or video, with follow-up questions |
| Scoring and ranking | Yes | Each answer is scored against your rubric and candidates are ranked |
| Shortlist handoff | Yes | Recruiters open a ranked list with transcripts and clip highlights |
| Rejecting candidates | No | The agent advances people to review, it never auto-rejects or auto-hires |
| Final interviews and offers | No | Your recruiters and hiring managers run these, as they should |
What does an AI recruiter actually do?
The honest answer is that it does one job well rather than the whole role. Recruiting is sourcing, screening, selling the job, coordinating a panel, and closing an offer. The only part that is genuinely repetitive, and therefore worth automating, is the first-round screen: the same fifteen minutes, the same questions, over and over, for every applicant.
That is the part InterviewAgent.ai takes. It interviews everyone who applies, asks the questions your team would ask, digs into answers that need it, and scores each response against a written rubric. Everything that needs judgment, persuasion or a relationship stays with your recruiters, who now have their hours back to do it.
Will an AI recruiter replace human recruiters?
No, and any vendor promising that is selling you a compliance problem. Screening at volume is a filtering task. Hiring is a judgment task, and in the United States it is a regulated one: EEOC guidance and New York City Local Law 144 both assume a human is accountable for the decision.
What changes is where recruiter time goes. Instead of spending Monday running twenty identical phone screens, a recruiter opens a ranked shortlist of candidates who have all already answered the same structured questions, and spends the day on the conversations that actually move a hire forward.
How does an AI recruiter score candidates?
You define the rubric: the competencies that matter for the role, and what a weak, adequate and strong answer looks like for each one. The agent scores every answer against those anchors and shows its work, quoting the part of the transcript that drove the score.
This is the part worth being careful about. A score you cannot explain is a score you cannot defend if a candidate or a regulator asks. Every score links back to what the candidate actually said, and our page on candidate interview scoring goes deeper on building a rubric that holds up.
How much does an AI recruiter cost?
InterviewAgent.ai starts at 149 dollars a month, with higher tiers at 399 and 999 dollars for larger interview volumes. Most AI recruiting tools in this category price on interview volume or on seats, and enterprise assessment suites typically quote annually and do not publish a price at all.
The comparison worth running is against the hours, not against another tool. A recruiter earning 70,000 dollars costs roughly 34 dollars an hour, so a hundred 15 minute phone screens is about 850 dollars of recruiter time before anyone has been shortlisted. Full pricing is on our pricing page, and we compare it with the rest of the market in our guide to what AI interview software costs.
Good questions
Questions about AI recruiter
Explore more
More ways hiring teams screen with InterviewAgent.ai
AI recruiting software
AI recruiting software that screens, scores, and shortlists for you.
Learn moreAI recruiting agent
An AI recruiting agent that runs the first-round interview and ranks the shortlist.
Learn moreCandidate screening software
Screen candidates with a structured interview, not a resume guess.
Learn moreStop running first-round calls by hand. Put screening on autopilot.
Set your role and rubric and the agent interviews every applicant, scores each answer, and ranks a shortlist for your team. The agent advances candidates, your recruiters make every hiring decision.
Role-tailored questions · bias-audited to EEOC and LL144 · human-in-the-loop